Jayden Wray 2011 Nat Cary in evidence:
Sally O'Neill QC, who is defending Mr Wray, suggested to Dr Carey that if Jayden had been shaken badly, it would have caused an "immediate and catastrophic collapse of this child".
Dr Carey denied this, however.
Funny how the evidence changes to suit the pattern of collapse isn't it - so when the baby is proven to have had a lucid interval, ie was OK upon arrival at A and E having had a bus journey to get there then it isn't an immediate collapse and die, however when the ambulance is called to the house, it's the last person caring for the child who is the suspect and then all of a sudden it is an immediate collapse and die.
Buy to lie? Yeah I think so! And as for the CPS, well they need to take a long hard look at what their experts are saying on a case to case basis, go over the transcripts and PMs and you'll see the lies flying off the pages, still I'm sure it wouldn't suit to scrutinise too carefully, otherwise they wouldn't be able to prosecute any of these cases would they!
Our taxes are being used to fraudulently prosecute these cases with the likes of Cary raking it in!
I'll just keep posting the evidence up here then!
1 comments:
This quack needs to be stopped, he needs to be investigated by the GMC as a minimum.
Child Abuse is not a Medical Diagnosis, it is merely an opinion and a dangerous one. When someone arrives at this opinion, there is no further reason to medically investigate or treat, often the child dies as a result.
No doctor is ever held accountable for their malpractice or the suffering imposed on the parents. The Websters and Louise Mason suffered unimaginable pain from the result of "Jumping to conclusions" by Quack.
I hope this quack gets what he deserves.
Post a Comment