Thing is he wasn't as evidenced below, he then repeats the lie over and over again in other trials, trials in which the defendant has either been acquitted or have, or are being appealed, through live note and through transcripts it has been established that this is what he has said. Now what,if any effect did that have on the jury, the judge other experts when they listened to that evidence? And now I know why he added the two years, he did it because he had already told porkies in the Whitewind case.
You have to wonder how many miscarriages of justice occur because of the lies told by the experts. It's bad enough that in a trial going back a couple of years that the expert whilst still giving evidence (lunch break) was heard to be having a discussion with a member of the CPS on their mobile phone in the toilets and that the witness was not believed because it was a family member of the defendant (all transcribed) even though there was evidence of coaching, to then have misleading testimony as to qualifications etc on top of that in attempts to swing the verdict.
A fair trial isn't too much to ask for is it?
Still I will carry on reading the evidence I have, whilst keeping my MP informed. Only a public enquiry will do now.
From: registrar@apothecaries.org
To: daretocare1@aol.com
Sent: 20/11/2009 14:53:25 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Dr Rupert Risdon
To: daretocare1@aol.com
Sent: 20/11/2009 14:53:25 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Dr Rupert Risdon
Dear Mrs Mellor,
Your email to Mrs Cook has been passed to me for reply.
Dr Rupert Risdon passed the Diploma in Medical Jursiprudence (Pathology) in January 1994.
0 comments:
Post a Comment